News

PESA does not sell or take commission from any of the events listed on this website.

Call for Papers: European Seminars in Philosophy of Education (ESPE)

When: 1 March 2025

The founding meeting of European Seminars in Philosophy of Education will be held at the University of Humanistic Studies, Utrecht, The Netherlands on July 3rd and 4th.

Contemporary philosophy of education benefits from a long legacy of thinking about education in Europe. Many of the concepts, theories, forms of argument and methodological approaches used today stem from traditions born and developed on the European continent, even if researchers are not always aware of these connections. At the same time, much of the European legacy to education has remained outside the scope of contemporary philosophy of education. Since much of the work done in the philosophy of education occurs in the English language, and English is only one of many languages spoken on the European continent, not all of the European conversation has made it into the current repertoire of ideas. In fact, some of the most important voices and ideas within this conversation have had almost no reception by Anglophone philosophers. European traditions of educational thinking deserve our attention not only because they have been overlooked, however, but also because our colleagues throughout the ages have seen in them a promise of making our encounters with young people more meaningful, more productive, and more focused on what really matters in a human life.

What are the European traditions that influence the contemporary philosophy of education, perhaps from the background? Which European traditions, ideas, theories or approaches has contemporary philosophy of education overlooked? What quali昀椀es a tradition or idea as “European”? And how might these traditions be reappropriated, reunderstood or reconceived in light of contemporary political and social challenges?

The European Seminars in Philosophy of Education aims to place these questions in the center of its inaugural meeting in July 2025. Not only because they are connected to the very notion of being “European”, but also because they have become particularly pertinent at this current socio-political moment. Europe is under strain.While the idea and reality of Europe have never been uncontested, we appear to have come to a historical juncture, perhaps even a moment of crisis. How, if at all, will Europe deal with the continuing war in the Ukraine, the resurgence of anti-Semitism, climate change, its colonial past? What geopolitical role is there for Europe in a world dominated, quite possibly, by China, India, and (still, for some time) the United States? Can Europe find ways to maintain itself without ruthlessly closing and patrolling its borders? Can Europe promote a more peaceful and more just world? And if so, what do we need to do in schools or other educational institutions to promote these goals?

All of these questions bear on education in many ways. Education is a space where identities are created: local, national, or transnational; cultural, moral, and personal identities. It is also a (re)generative space for communities and geopolitical entities. Historical narratives are transmitted through education, and new, more honest, self-critical and just historical narratives can be created and begin to take root there.At the same time, education can be and has been used as a tool merely to promote economic growth or to spread political ideologies. Education in Europe is at the forefront of many such tensions.

In reflecting on these issues, it is worth returning to European traditions in educational thinking, broadly conceived to include both formal and informal education and child-rearing, that can offer fruitful ways forward.These may be traditions or perspectives that remain marginal in the Anglophone world of philosophy of education or enclosed within the borders of single European nations. A Europe that is open to the world also needs to be open within itself.
The deadline for submissions for the 2025 conference is 1st of March 2025. Submissions should be anonymized as well as sent along with your name, title and affiliation (university and department) in a separate file. Contributors will be informed whether their submissions are accepted by the 1st of April 2025.
Please send your submissions to: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Questioning Technology in Education: Countering Dominant Narratives and Developing Strategies of Resistance

When: Submission deadline: November 15, 2024

Contact: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Proposals papers and panels (symposia) are invited for the 2025 Canadian Philosophy of Education Society (CPES) pre-conference. The preconference, which will take place the day before the CPES conference in Toronto, will include at least one invited speaker, as well as what we hope will be a solid number of presentations by those who are members, or are considering membership, of CPES. Graduate students are especially encouraged to submit a proposal, and proposals from other disciplines are welcome, as long as they clearly address the theme.
• Proposal length: Max. 3 pages, double-spaced in 11-point font or greater. References may follow on additional page(s). Proposals must include a title.
• Proposal types: Papers (single-authored or multi-authored) or panels that include 3- 4 short presentations by diTerent authors on the same topic.
• Submission format: Submit as Word or .pdf email attachment to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
• Submission deadline: November 15, 2024
• Submission or registration fee: none! The pre-conference is sponsored by the Canadian Philosophy of Education Society, the journal Philosophical Inquiry in Education, and the Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance, Concordia University. Lunch will be included.

Questioning Technology in Education: Introduction of Pre-Conference Theme
25 years ago, we found ourselves at the end of a technology hype cycle. Academics and public intellectuals made breathless pronouncements about the advent of the “global village,” and wrote high-minded essays about how the internet would empower ordinary citizens to become more politically active. One laptop per child, the internet on everyone’s desktop and perhaps, even, in everyone’s pocket. John Dewey’s dream of “knowledge becoming liquid,” knowledge democratized and flowing through the fibre-optic cables to whoever might want it, was finally at hand. Sure, there might be a few conspiracy theorists
here and there, and a few corporate types looking to line their pockets, but this would all give way before the internet’s overwhelming democratizing power.
In retrospect, we would have done better to read Jacques Ellul than Nicholas Negroponte. There’s no good or bad use of the internet, Ellul would say, there is just the most eTicient use, or what he would have called the “technical” use of it. The technical use, Ellul thinks, always dominates. In other words, it may not be especially democratic or empowering for Uber to have replaced all those independent taxi drivers, but we can’t deny that Uber has made the transactions smoother and more eTicient. The aggregation of corporate power in this way has continued in many other sectors. For example, social media companies professionalized the early internet’s “amateur hour” look and feel, aggregating audiences of billions on their platforms.
We find ourselves amid a renewed tech hype cycle today. This time, AI technology is at the forefront, although the blockchain is still in the mix. AI is going to be great for education, we are told. Everything is going to be transformed by it. A school board oTicial recently asked me how it could possibly be useful for a student to learn to do a task which could be performed by AI. I had a lot of diTiculty sympathizing with this point of view, since much of schooling, and maybe even learning more generally, has historically consisted of the execution of tasks more eTiciently accomplished by other means.
Scholars working in the foundations of education, at least compared to their colleagues elsewhere in Schools of Education, have usually been better than average at resisting tech hype. Perhaps this is because philosophers have a good view of the core principles of education, which have proven relatively stable over time, while historians understand the institutional dynamics of schools and their general resistance to change. As historian Larry Cuban pointed out, we have seen many cases in which the technology has been “oversold and underused,” or, as philosopher Kieran Egan might have noted, in which new technology has been emphasized at the expense of a coherent educational vision.
The purpose of this CPES preconference is to provide a space to question and resist dominant discourses around educational technology. There are many ways to do this, as there is a long tradition of questioning technology both within Western philosophy, as well as in other, non-Western philosophical traditions. Although this is a CPES preconference, approaches from other foundations disciplines are welcome, as sociologists and historians have made critical contributions to this question in the past. Views that are more hopeful about technology are also welcome, on condition that they engage the “Questioning Technology” theme of the preconference.

CPES 2025 CALL FOR PROPOSALS

When: Proposal Deadline: 9 October 2024

https://csse-scee.ca/conference-2025/

Contact: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

We would like to extend a warm invitation to submit your proposals for the upcoming 2025 meeting of the Canadian Philosophy of Education Society (CPES). CPES’s annual meeting includes paper sessions, panels, symposia, and an array of networking opportunities. CPES operates under the umbrella of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education (CSSE), which holds its annual meeting in the context of the broader Congress 2025 event, hosted by the Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences. CSSE’s 53rd annual conference is scheduled to span from 31 May 2025 (pre-conference day) to 5 June 2025 (post-conference day). The conference will be held at George Brown College in Toronto, Ontario. For comprehensive details about the conference location, theme, and submission guidelines, please visit the CSSE website at https://csse-scee.ca/conference-2025/.

Educating Philosophers: A Handbook of Best Practice

When: Expressions of Interest Deadline: October 1st, 2024

https://rb.gy/paket6

Contact: Editors: Kenneth R. Westphal (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.) or Mark Addis (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.).

The vast majority of philosophers are academics earning their living primarily as teachers. Yet only a tiny fraction are actively interested in philosophy of education or take notice of such jour- nals as Teaching Philosophy. Currently philosophy is under acute pressure from the political econ- omy of higher education and institutions to justify its continued existence as an academic disci- pline. Concurrently, the quantity of philosophical work published has expanded to the point where proper and effective operation of the peer review process is increasingly difficult. These trends challenge philosophers to demonstrate the value of their professional activity and in par- ticular to show that academic discussion is not merely an end in itself. Responding to this chal- lenge requires fresh or at least refreshed and convincing answers to the question, What are the educational responsibilities of philosophers?
These educational responsibilities are wide ranging; classroom teaching and research supervision are central, but not exhaustive. Also included are education in professional ethics and integrity; mentoring new faculty members; training for the full range of professional responsibilities within the department, institution and wider profession, including review of applications for tenure or promotion, publication submissions and funding applications; and public engagement. Just as education enables children to become competent and responsible adults, it enables culture to continue beyond the current generation. More specifically there are educational relations between social institutions and their practitioners ranging from societies and their citizens to particular professions and professionals such as philosophers. In each educational relation vital issues arise concerning the training and induction of newly qualified members, maintenance of sufficient competence and integrity, fostering worthwhile expertise and innovation, and the assessment, revision or improvement of procedures, techniques or standards. These issues raise a wide range of questions which can be creatively addressed which this handbook seeks to address.

PES/Educational Theory Pre-Conference Workshop: PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION BEYOND THE HUMAN

When: Deadline: November 1st, 2024; Workshop: March 6th, 2025

Where: Baltimore, Maryland

https://www.philosophyofeducation.org/resources/Documents/Conference_Calls/PES_Call_2025_correct.pdf

Contact: Program Chair Oded Zipory

The committee invites submissions for the Pre-Conference Workshop, "Philosophy of Education Beyond the Human." The pre-conference workshop presents a unique opportunity to engage with colleagues, with the goal of creating a shared intellectual conversation around the proposed theme.

Accepted papers will be workshopped during a series of collaborative sessions with the other contributors throughout the day on March 6, 2025, before the annual PES conference in Baltimore begins that evening. The revised papers will then be considered for publication in a special issue of Educational Theory. Hotel accommodation for the night of March 5 and all meals during the March 6 workshops will be covered by the journal.

Paper proposals (1000 words, excluding references) are due on September 16, 2024. These will undergo an anonymous review process and authors will be informed if their proposal has been accepted for the pre-conference workshop by October 11, 2024.

EPAT Special Issue & Workshop - Canonical Pluralism: New Approaches to Teaching the History of Philosophy

When: November 20, 2024

https://think.taylorandfrancis.com/special_issues/canonical-pluralism/?_gl=1*2m8ctc*_gcl_au*MTczMTg5OTQ0MC4xNzIxMjcwMDY0*_ga*MTUwODIzNjc5OC4xNzIxMjY5Nzc0*_ga_0HYE8YG0M6*MTcyMzYwODAxMC4yLjEuMTcyMzYwODI1Ni41OS4wLjA.&_ga=2.124826762.1811307841.1723608011-150

Contact: Elisabeth Widmer and Bettina Bussmann

In contrast to academic philosophy, teaching philosophy consists largely of reading philosophers from the past. This approach presupposes selecting works and authors that culminate in a ‘canon’: a set of works or authors from a specific period deemed outstanding by individuals at a later period. The formation of a canon is inherently subject to tension: While the criteria for canonical relevance reflect the outcome of a collective deliberation process, guided by philosophical experts and educators, these criteria are prone to perpetuating the social biases of a dominant tradition, social group, or class. This tension is particularly pertinent in the educational context. On one hand, philosophy educators face the task of conveying thought traditions that preserve an intellectual history. On the other hand, educators ought to minimize the risk of adopting methods that perpetuate problematic social biases. To balance these aims, this special issue explores pluralistic approaches to canonical relevance. Canonical pluralism, as we understand it, suggests that in order to minimize social biases, philosophy education requires pluralistic standards of ‘relevance,’ reflected and integrated into the content of canons and teaching methods.

Objectives

We are interested in heterodox methods in the history of philosophy and using their approaches to reflect on novel ways in how to understand ‘canonical relevance.’ We are particularly interested in three recent developments in the history of philosophy. First, various philosophers have made significant efforts to deliver interpretations sensitive the social biases in canonical authors or have argued for the importance of reading past philosophers against the backdrop of current moral and scientific standards. We aim to explore the numerous hermeneutical approaches that emerged from their goal to unveil social biases in canonical authors and works, and to redefine how we teach these authors in a socially responsible manner.

(i) Our first objective is to scrutinize the hermeneutical methods that acknowledge social biases in canonical authors and to question how these approaches alter our view of the conceptualization of canonical relevance.

Second, we are interested in new approaches to the history of philosophy that include philosophers from less privileged backgrounds, such as female authors, philosophers of colour, authors from educationally disadvantaged backgrounds, and non-Western or non-Christian philosophers. Recent years have seen historians of philosophy working to expand and change the philosophical canon. This has shifted the view on the history of philosophy in two respects: moving away from a highly individualistic approach to viewing it as a collective endeavour and including perspectives from other disciplines where marginalized authors had better access. In both cases, we observe a shift away from assessing philosophy based on logical rigor, moving towards an approach that values the novelty and influence of philosophical ideas.

(ii) Our second objective is to reflect on the philosophical presuppositions that underlie interdisciplinary and inclusive approaches to the history of philosophy. Our aim is to utilize their insights to redefine what is considered canonically relevant.

Third, we are interested in decolonial and non-Western approaches to the canon that call for a fundamental rethinking of the perspective from which we make canonical judgments. Post-colonial and critical race theorists have emphasized the importance of shifting the philosophy curriculum and canon from a hegemonic to a pluralist perspective. These movements critically point out that the concepts and notions we deal with are inherently part of a tradition that can only be combatted with a decentralized perspective.

(iii) Our third objective is to explore the insights gained from decolonial perspectives that perceive the canon as an ongoing negotiation process. We aim to understand the lessons that can be drawn when canonical relevance is defined in an inherently open manner.

SHAKING DOWN ON VISUAL PEDAGOGIES

When: December 4th, 2024 9:30 am -12 noon

Where: Tūranga, Christchurch, New Zealand

https://visualpedagogies.com/2024-seminar-series/

Contact: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

In collaboration with the PESA conference, the Association for Visual Pedagogies (AVP) presents a panel discussion, followed by interactive workshops, traversing what visual pedagogies shake up and settle down. This discussion and following workshops will delve into the initiatives, innovations, integrations, and ubiquitous potentials of visualities, illustrating ways of seeing, approaching, understanding, and entangling the visual.

SCOPICASTING – DOING VISUAL METHODS TO CRAFT SOCIAL FUTURES

When: November 14th 2024 13.00 – 14:30 (DK Time)

Where: Face to Face and Online, Lancaster University, UK

https://visualpedagogies.com/2024-seminar-series/

Contact: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

This is a symposium for reseachers at all stages of their career and across disciplines interested in applying and developing visual research methods and pedagogies in relation to their disciplines to inform social futures.

The symposium particularly focuses on visual methods in conjunction with speculative/futures thinking and futures methods, to underpin social transformation and change. It will feature presentations and panel discussions by leading voices in visual pedagogies and methods, such as Prof Jayne White (AVP).

VIRTUAL REALITY FORUM IMMERSIVE POSSIBILITIES OF EDUCATION IN VR

When: September 16th 2024, 6.30 pm (NZST)

Where: Online

https://visualpedagogies.com/2024-seminar-series/

Contact: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

In line with the current visual technology developments The Association for Visual Pedagogies initiated a Virtual Reality Forum about and in VR. This forum welcomes any members who have an interest in VR. Our group is very diverse and is comprised of researchers, academics, gamers, students, VR enthusiasts, VR industry representatives, VR game arcade owners, people working in IT and others.This event will be held in the VR space and will be about exploring and discussing VR specific opportunities for immersive collaborations across distances.

Call for Papers: Special Issue “Educational Mosaic: Understanding BRICS States”

When: 15 November 2024

https://weraonline.org/call-for-papers-special-issue-educational-mosaic-understanding-brics-states/

The Educational Studies journal invites scholars to contribute to an upcoming special issue dedicated to exploring the multifaceted landscape of education within the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates).

The BRICS states represent diverse educational systems, cultural contexts, and socio-economic challenges, offering rich ground for comparative analysis and original research. We welcome contributions that address various dimensions of education within the BRICS framework, including but not limited to:
- Policy and governance in education
- Cultural heritage and values in education
- Curriculum development and reform
- Extracurricular and informal education
- Equity, access, and inclusion
- Relevant evaluation and assessment metrics in education
- Teacher education and professional development
- Higher education dynamics and challenges

Symposium: The Changing Landscape of Education and ITE in Aotearoa

When: Friday 30 August, 9.30am–3.30pm

Where: Community Engagement Hub Rehua 108, Ilam Campus

https://events.humanitix.com/the-changing-landscape-of-education-and-initial-teacher-education-in-aotearoa

Contact: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Co-hosted by Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia (PESA) and Te Kaupeka Ako Faculty of Education, this symposium brings together teachers, principals, academics and educators to draw on educational philosophy and theory to address topics of interest for practitioners in schools and centres.

Sessions:
The Changing Landscape of Education and ITE
Joce Nuttall, UC

Ethics and Decision Making in Education
Daniella Forster, Newcastle, AU

Culturally Responsive Practice
Jen Smith, Kay-Lee Jones, UC

Doing the Right Work the Right Way – Implications for Leadership Practice in Education
Panel discussion

Laura D’Olimpio, The Necessity of Aesthetic Education: the place of the arts on the curriculum, (Bloomsbury) 2024

The Necessity of Aesthetic Education is a manifesto. That which is experienced through engagement with art, through the many various and diverse art forms and media, is uniquely and essentially valuable to the lives of human beings. In order to fully appreciate and gain the most out of the arts, which offer a variety of aesthetic experience, there are concepts, skills and techniques integral to such understanding. In this book, Laura D'Olimpio argues that aesthetic education ought to be a compulsory part of education for all school-aged students, from pre-primary to high school, on the basis of its distinctive value. Such an argument is timely, given the so-called crisis in the arts and humanities, with declining student numbers in subjects that do not have a direct vocational correlative, and increased focus on science, engineering, technology and mathematics (STEM) subjects. As funding cuts increasingly slash the support for the arts, there is a need to argue for why the arts and arts education is valuable, for their own sake, as well as for the positive contributions they can and do make to society. Through critical engagement with a range of thinkers including Maxine Greene, John Dewey and Elliot Eisner, D'Olimpio offers a unique and important contribution to aesthetic education, and to research within philosophy of education.
Table of Contents
Series Editor's Foreword
Acknowledgements
Introduction
1. Arts Education in Policy and Practice
2. Why Value The Arts and Arts Education?
3. Defending Arts Education
4. On the Centrality of Aesthetic Experience
5. Objections and Replies
6. Instrumental Defences of Arts Education
7. Aesthetics and Ethics
Conclusion: The Necessity of Arts Education
References
Index

https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/necessity-of-aesthetic-education-9781350120907/